The Blue Star

Fletcher Pratt, The Blue Star (©1952, Ballantyne Books 1969)

These days I get my genre fiction – science fiction, fantasy, crime and romance – mainly on screens. I’ve learned that Lynda La Plante and Steven Bochco are for external application only (ie, as novelists they suck), and I prefer my J K Rowling that way as well. All the same, even though the number of books I’ll get to read before the lights go out is shrinking daily, I’m not prepared to give up the pleasures of reading genre just yet. The Blue Star predates The Lord of the Rings: it’s fantasy from an earlier era – no dwarfs, elves or Celtic myths, and what magic there is is only slightly less abstract than the sex.  Actually, the 1969 edition I acquired via BookMooch is labelled adult fantasy, and one of the unexpected pleasures of the book is discovering just how chaste adult fantasy could be back then.

A prologue promises an alternative universe where magic occupies the place that science occupies in ours. If that promise creates an expectation of something like Terry Pratchett’s Discworld, then the book will disappoint. In fact, the practitioners of magic are a tiny, proscribed minority. Our young hero starts out as an idealistic member of a revolutionary group in a land ruled by a queen (who remains an abstraction) and a repressive social order. Following orders from the Central Committee he seduces a young witch and promises fidelity in order to gain control of her Blue Star, an amulet that gives its wearer telepathic powers. There’s a love story, then, and a political story: will the seduction lead to true love? can a revolutionary movement with such a utilitarian attitude to young love really lead to freedom? The playing out of these questions is diverting enough, and the subversively anti-romantic politics are engaging, especially the section about the Amorosans, who talk the talk of everything being done in love, but in the place where they hold power they are just as repressive as their enemies. On the whole, though, this is not a landmark book. If you can imagine a Lord of the Rings where Bilbo decides that there are more important things than destroying the ring and that the Return of the King and the defeat of Sauron, for good or bad, will happen (or not) without his help, you have some idea of the impact.

A word of warning: skip Lin Carter’s spoilerish introduction, or at least save it for after you’ve read the rest of the book. You might also want to skip the prologue, which seems to be there to justify the fantasy mode, and doesn’t do it very well.

4 responses to “The Blue Star

  1. I think you’re being unfair to The Blue Start. Tolkien chose to write a Nordic saga about dealing with an obvious and overwhelming evil, based on his view of World War I; Pratt chose to write a narrative of people, not just events and types, with a background of two more subtle evils. (Call them “royalism” and “totalitarianism” for simplicity). Tolkien gives us the delusion that one grand action would restore a pastoral idyl (the sort of idyl that would seem plausible to a closeted Oxford don); Pratt reminds us that the real world is more complex, and that every person in it matters. (cf Rite of Passage, in which the narrator grows up by realizing there are no spear-carriers.) For that reason I’d argue that it is a landmark book; it may not be seminal because Terry Brooks and his ilk went haring off after the noise of Tolkien such that we’re now drowning in heroic (and anti-heroic?) fantasy, but it was a major step forward for the field.

    • Thanks, Chip. I happily acknowledge my ignorance about the genre, and your comment makes a lot of sense to me. I’ll keep an eye out for Rite of Passage

  2. I’m the guy who mooched your copy of THE BLUE STAR and only now (2013) have I finally read it and am able to comment. Since I have never read Tolkien (heresy I know) I cannot compare this to his work but I for one thoroughly enjoyed the experience. It seems to me to be far more reality based than most fantasy books and well grounded in regards to what a political intrigue is actually like, probably due to Pratt’s knowledge of history. Pratt is no James Branch Cabell in style but I have enjoyed any works of his that I have read.

    • Hi Ron. Thanks for commenting. I’m glad you enjoyed the book, and clearly my comparison to Tolkien was fairly stupid anyhow. I’m impressed that you’ve managed to avoid him.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s