I won’t name the podcast. I suppose if I had been listening with real interest I wouldn’t have got snagged on what is after all a common usage these days, but it was drilled into me in primary school that one lies down and lays the table, lay down and laid the table, and my mind evidently still replays the nuns’ rebukes from 1954.
November verse 9: Yelling at my phone She said she just laid in the water. I shouted at my phone: Laid what? The language changes and I ought to take it in my strides – why not? Give someone an intensive purpose. Let him join an army corpus, answer questions someone begs and buy the dozens that are egg's. Sneak peaks aren't fit to die on. The world's just right for doggy-dogs but still wrong for slow-boiling frogs. The planet warms, we may be dying. As we near that final night at least let's try to spell it right.
In case any of the references are obscure:
- line 4: the correct idiom is ‘take it in my stride’
- line 5: ‘to all intents and purposes’ means something; ‘to all intensive purposes’ doesn’t
- line 6: ‘Corps’ is pronounced to rhyme with ‘core’. And in my opinion ‘corp’, short for ‘corporation’, should be pronounced as written
- line 7: ‘To beg the question’ does not mean the same as ‘to raise the question’. In classical logic, it happens when an argument’s premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it
- line 8: Apostrophes aren’t necessary when an s is there to indicate more than one of something. (Apostrophes are probably necessary hardly anywhere, but that’s another argument)
- line 9: It’s a sneak peek and a dog-eat-dog world
- line 10: The analogy of a frog that won’t jump out of boiling water if it boils gradually may be instructive, but I’d like to know if there’s any evidence that frogs are that stupid