Category Archives: LoSoRhyMo

November verse 4 & Montaigne progress report 8

Michel de Montaigne, The Complete Essays (Penguin Classics 1991, translated by M. A. Screech)
– part way through Book 2, essay 40, ‘On the resemblance of children to their fathers’ to part way through Book 3, essay 5, ‘On Some lines from Virgil’

Montaigne’s essays become even more interesting as he ages. By Book 3, he writes about his chronic pain from ‘the stone’ and, especially in the innocuously titled ‘On some lines from Virgil’, he does some spectacular writing about sexual politics.

I expect that whole books have been written about Montaigne and sex. I won’t try to untangle any of it here. I’ll just quote the paragraph from today’s reading that has given my poem its opening line. (For those who came in late, this November I’m writing at least 14 fourteen line poems, the first line of each coming from something I’ve heard or read that day.) The paragraph will give you just a glimpse of the complexity of Montaigne’s thought:

We do not weigh the vices fairly in our estimation. Both men and women are capable of hundreds of kinds of corrupt activities more damaging than lasciviousness and more disnatured. But we make things into vices and weigh them not according to their nature but our self-interest: that is why they take on so many unfair forms. The ferocity of men’s decrees about lasciviousness makes the devotion of women to it more vicious and ferocious than its characteristics warrant, and engages it in consequences which are worse than their cause.

I think he’s saying that making sexual behaviour a major criterion for a woman’s reputation is wrong; men make the rules that condemn women’s ‘immorality’; and the punishments are much worse than the so-called crimes. Further on in the essay he says that social expectations on women to be chaste are an intolerable burden.

I don’t know if he is putting a proto-feminist case, or arguing deviously that women should be more sexually available to men. Or both. Either way, it’s fascinating to have a voice from a very different epoch wrestling with questions that aren’t exactly resolved today.

But before I leave Montaigne for my own versification, I can’t resist quoting the final paragraph from Book 2, which follows some strong opinions about the medical profession, and rings out like a beacon of rationality for our times:

I do not loathe ideas which go against my own. I am so far from shying away when others’ judgements clash with mine … that, on the contrary, just as the most general style followed by Nature is variety – even more in minds than in bodies, since minds are of a more malleable substance capable of accepting more forms – I find it much rarer to see our humours and purposes coincide. In the whole world there has never been two identical opinions, any more than two identical hairs or seeds. Their most universal characteristic is diversity.

Yay Montaigne!

But on with my verse, which takes the phrase somewhere else altogether – and you can probably see the point when news from the USA knocked the poem off its tracks:

November verse 4: We do not weigh the vices fairly
We do not weigh the vices fairly,
thumb the scales to suit our whim:
I exaggerate, quite rarely –
you tell fibs – but look at him!
His lies destroy the trust that binds us,
lead us where no truth can find us.
Crowds have wisdom, mobs can rule,
electorates can play the fool.
He's murderous and self-regarding,
incoherent, vile, inane.
He once could boast a showman's brain,
but principles are for discarding.
Lord of Misrule, theatre's Vice:
How could you choose him once, then twice?

This blog post was written on Gadigal-Wangal land, where the tiny lizards are enjoying the beginning of hot weather, and jacarandas are the land’s most spectacular guests. I acknowledge the Elders past, present and emerging of Gadigal and Wangal of the Eora Nation.

November verse 3, 2024

Today’s opening line is from the early pages of Yael van der Wouden’s novel, The Safekeep, which I’ve just read and will blog about after our Book Club meeting next month.

Verse 3: The cauliflower browned and rotting
The cauliflower browned and rotting
says it's time to clean the fridge.
The cheese is mouldy, milk is clotting,
Friday's curry's on the edge.
Outside it's the same sad story:
jacaranda's purple glory
withers, falls and clogs the drain,
the sky’s deep blue has turned to rain,
my feet hurt when I go out walking,
I may soon replace a knee,
beauty fades and pleasures flee.
Yet here I am, still happy gawking.
Now,halfway down Dulwich Street,
the mulberries are very sweet.

Some of this is nicked from the superb 19th century song, ‘Housewife’s Lament’ by Sara A Price. If you don’t know that song, I recommend that you click on this link.

Madeline Miller’s Song of Achilles and November verse 2

Madeline Miller, The Song of Achilles (HarperCollins 2011)

The first half of The Song of Achilles is in effect a Young Adult boy-meets-boy love story, as the demigod Achilles befriends our narrator Patroclus, one of his father’s many foster-sons. The friendship becomes increasingly steamy until, while the language remains as chaste as anyone could wish, the two teenage boys find rapture in each other’s arms and are soon tacitly acknowledged as a couple. ‘Patroclus is my sworn companion,’ Achilles announces at a state occasion. ‘His place is beside me.’ This is against the will of Achilles’ goddess mother, Thetis.

Most of my readers won’t need to be told that Patroclus and Achilles are key characters from The Iliad, and that the emotional heart of that epic is Achilles deep love of Patroclus and his inconsolable grief when Patroclus is killed. This novel is mainly back story. The explicit sex isn’t so much a departure from the original as a confirmation.

At about the halfway point, after spending years being trained by the centaur Chiron and an episode in which Achilles hides out dressed as a girl, the two young men arrive with the vast Greek war force at the beach near Troy. Achilles is now acclaimed as the greatest of the Greek warriors, and the second half of the book is a completely engrossing retelling of The Iliad.


Because it’s November*, I won’t linger on page 77, when teenaged Patroclus wakes up in bed next to Achilles in Chiron’s cave. Instead, I have gone to page one, and read until I came to a potential first line for an Onegin stanza. The book begins with Patroclus’ mentally incompetent mother and his own physical ineptitude (the only element in Madeline Miller’s telling that conflicts with my own reading of The Iliad – it had never occurred to me that Patroclus was less than formidable). Patroclus’ first glimpse of Achilles is when Patroclus is five years old. Achilles is among the youngest boys who compete in games hosted by Patroclus’ royal father and, being a demigod, he wins. This is in spite of being easily the youngest competitor: ‘He is shorter than the others, and still plump with childhood in a way they are not.’

In the book, this last sentence signifies that Achilles is gifted well beyond his years. When I nicked part of it for my first line, my mind went somewhere completely different, to a memory from 60+ years ago.

Verse 1: Nudgee College, 1961–1962
He is shorter than the others,
thinner too, not seen as cool.
We've all been sent here from our mothers,
to this Christian boarding school,
sons of far-flung Queensland farmers,
just four hundred teenage charmers:
ten grown men. It's no surprise
that kindness doesn't rule our days.
His nakedness provokes derision,
soapsuds sprinkled in his sheets
cause eczema, and laughter greets
his asthma. Here's my shamed admission:
terrified, I turn my back
glad it's not me they attack.

OK, maybe tomorrow will get cheerful.

Added later: Inspired by the online course in Modern and Contemporary American Poetry (ModPo) I’m currently doing, here’s a chance-based/ procedural poem created from The Song of Achilles. It begins with the book’s first word beginning with A, which is followed by the first word after that to begin with B, and so on. It took 52 pages to get to ‘Zeus’.

A built ceremony
did eye forward
glints.
He is jest kneeling
looked man
not one present quieted
raised
said things
upbringing vividness
when exile you Zeus

I wrote this blog post in Gadigal Wangal country, and am posting it as lorikeets shout to each other about the rain that is about to come down. I acknowledge Elders past, present and emerging for their continuing custodianship of this land, over which their sovereignty has never been ceded.


* For the last 14 years, I have challenging myself to write fourteen 14-line poems during November. The poem may be inspired by a book I’m blogging about, or may be connected to it by the vaguest of tangents, as here.

November verse 1, 2024

This is my 15th year of challenging myself to write fourteen 14-line poems in November. You can browse past efforts here, or you could even buy one of the five little books I’ve made out of them – here. Pretty much all the poems are in the form of the Onegin stanza, so called because it was used by Alexandr Pushkin in his epic poem Eugene Onegin, which you can read in translation at this link.

This year, to make it more interesting (for me, and hopefully for my readers), I’ve added an extra constraint. The first line of the poem has to be exact words I read or overhear as I go about my day.

This morning, listening the Waleed Aly, Scott Stephens and Stan Grant on ABC’s The Minefield, I remembered to keep my ears peeled for an appropriate line, and got one almost immediately. (It’s mere coincidence that my first verse last year was also in response to the Minefield, and Stan Grant gets a mention in the comments on that post.)

Verse 1: 
The presence of a word like evil,
words like vampire, demon, troll
on streets here on All Hallows' Eve'll
titillate a sinless soul.
Bloodied bones and headless torsos,
manic laughter from the shadows,
devils, succubi, afreets:
prelude to a bag of sweets.

Then we sleep, or read the papers.
Nightmares happen, fright gets real.
Hamas,Bibi, fossil fuels,
plastic, wannabe dictators,
all that’s precious bought and sold:
words to make your blood run cold.

I’ll try for something more cheerful in Verse 2.

November verses 13 and 14

My last two stanzas for this year are a Terminal, which I believe is something developed by the late John Tranter. The last word in each line is the corresponding word in two stanzas taken pretty much at random (Chapter 4, verses 30 and 31, if you’re interested) from Babette Deutsch’s 1943 translation of Eugene Onegin, which is online at Internet Archive. I think they make a kind of sense.

Verses 13 & 14: Religion
Hell was terrifying. Hades,
though a similar abode,
was not too rude for talk with ladies
even in a jokey mode.
Ancient gods just decorated
what we knew had been created
by our one true God. The pen
was weaker than the Word. Amen!
Now neither Zeus nor Yahweh win me
over. I just don’t inscribe
them on my heart. No diatribe
from either sounds alarms within me.
No need to be satirical
nor offer hymn or madrigal.

Yet I’ve been faithful in my fashion.
I don’t fear hell now, not a bit,
but David’s psalms and Matthew’s Passion,
Priam’s grief and Dante’s wit
speak to me of things that matter.
Life without them would be flatter.
As sunlight sets fine jewels aglow
and wine makes conversation flow,
these ancient tales hold my affection.
I know I've no immortal soul,
that death is death, and lives will roll
their course. Each adds to the collection:
wisdom, folly, grace. Update:
no gods, no providence, no fate.

Normal blogging will resume shortly.

November verse 12

Even though the Sydney Morning Herald ran a story on their website about the weekend’s Rising Tide blockade, it has maintained its silence in the print edition, except for a letter from Cathering Rossiter, of Fadden.

Verse 12: Newspaper of record?
(after the Sydney Morning Herald 
print edition, 28 November 2023)

In other news, a mass extinction
threatens unless something's done
to stop all fossil fuel extraction.
Letter on page twenty-one
thanks the thousands who blockaded 
Port Newcastle (paddled, waded,
were arrested, took a stand),
but that's the lot, the story's canned. 
A riot would have been reported,
violent death would make page one,
Pezzullo, Lehrmann, courtroom fun.
But thirty hours, no coal exported:
silence. Are they clowns or cads?
Wel, fossil fuellers run big ads*.

* See SMH, 27 November, page 9

November verse 11

I’ve been a bit busy, and will struggle to reach my quota of 14 stanzas this month. Here’s a what-I-did-on-the-weekend verse.

Verse 11: The Rising Tide blockade of Newcastle coal port
With face paint, dolphins, rain and thunder,
unicorn and sousaphone,
for thirty hours, a joyful wonder,
kayaks shut the coal port down. 
Face to face with climate evil,
disobedience was civil.
Some as clowns or pirates dressed
a hundred brave souls faced arrest,
while hundreds on the shore were chanting,
'No more coal, no more oil,
keep that carbon in the soil.'
Drumming, singing, waving, dancing:
'Stop the coal, stop the ships,
we say no apocalypse.'

Added Monday morning: Shockingly, today’s Sydney Morning Herald makes no mention of this huge act of civil disobedience. It carries a huge ad for ‘oil and gas giant’ Woodside.

Added Tuesday morning: The Sydney Morning Herald did run a piece on the blockade, dated 7.31 yesterday morning, so too late for Monday’s newspaper. It’s mentioned in the ‘In other news’ section of their morning email. You can read it here.

November verse 10

I don’t think this one needs any explanation.

10. Webinar
We used to meet, shake hands, rub shoulders,
curse the traffic, kiss a cheek,
queue for name tags, bags and folders, 
find a chair that didn’t squeak.
Now it’s all, ‘You’re not unmuted,’
‘Can the speaker be spotlighted?’
‘Check the webpage in the chat,’
‘Share a screen – Oh look, a cat!’
To meet up now, we all go zooming:
names attached, we fill our screens
with gallery view, and by this means
we see a score of 2-D humans.
Minds still meet, and even hearts,
but what of one another's farts?

November verse 9: From Debra Dank

I’ve just read Debra Dank’s We Come with this Place, an astonishing book that I expect to blog about soon. It won four of the prizes at the NSW Premier’s Literary Awards this year: you can read the judges’ comments here and here.

Today’s stanza is a versification of the first paragraph of the chapter ‘Yarned into Place’. It’s probably useful to say that the red dust of Gudanji Country is a powerful presence throughout the book.

Verse 9: From Debra Dank
'Nyamirniji ilinga jaburru'
'You listen first and then you'll know.'
The road ahead lies straight and narrow,
dictates where our car will go.
A line dug in the land by grader,
straight as pencil-rule on paper,
irons out what that land has lived
and seen: a scar. We'd be deceived
but there behind us all the swirling
waves and billows of red dust
erase that line, as breezes must,
defy geometry’s appalling
power. No straight line. All around
dust hides what hides the sacred ground.

Here’s the original prose, from page 239 of the book:

‘Nyamirniji ilinga jaburru,’ she said. ‘You listen first and then you will know.’ The road stretched ahead, an astonishing river of earth that we, travelling in a white troopie, moved along as if in a boat. As far ahead as we could see, the road continued straight. Someone had taken out a grader and dug a straight line across the landscape as easily as they would have used a ruler to draw a line on a paper map. And they built that road, so straight and flat that it ironed out all the history this country had lived and seen, leaving just that awful scarring mark. But, when we looked behind us, swirling and billowing waves of red dust obliterated the road, twisting and turning in eddies and breezes. There was not a straight line to be found anywhere.

November verse 8: Dum diversas

I’m not sure that my little stanzas can address truly horrible things. It’s almost a kind of blasphemy to tie up great, tragic events and concepts into a neat little rhyming package. But one of my aims in these November stanzas is to grab whatever is occupying my mind at the time and wrangle it into verse.

This issue may not be as urgently of the moment as some, but I learned some time ago that the English invaders of Australia in the late 1700s didn’t invoke the doctrine of terra nullius as justification. For at least the first fifty years of settlement, no one pretended that there was anything other than a war of occupation and resistance. Courts and governments only started talking about terra nulliius in the 1860s or later.* The moral / legal justification, if there was any, dated back to the Doctrine of Discovery, which was understood to have originated in a series of papal bulls in the 1400s. The Doctrine of Discovery has been repudiated by Pope Francis but the bulls have not been rescinded.

The first of the papal bulls, Dum diversas, was issued by Pope Nicolas V in 1452, addressed to King Alfonse of Portugal. If you have the stomach for it, you can read an English translation here. Here’s my short, rhyming version of the ghastly gist:

Verse 8: Dum Diversas
Divine Love is what animates us,
faith for which Christ shed his blood.
We must protect from all that hates us
all our flock, from lamb to stud, 
and so we grant you full, free power
wherever Christ's love does not flower:
invade, fight, conquer, subjugate,
take land, enslave, appropriate,
enrich yourselves, no mercy ever, 
leave no stone upon a stone,
destroy, heap blood-stained bone on bone.
And all who help in this endeavour,
should they die, to lose or win,
their souls shall be absolved of sin.

* I am not a historian. Please correct me in the comments if I need correcting.